Across the Brazos by the great American artist Robert McGinnis (born 1926). McGinnis did over 1200 paperback book covers and movie posters. Here is a good example how the newly invented CinemaScope format also influenced the formats of paintings.
We rarely consider paperback book covers and movie posters as fine art, nor do most art historians examine how the CinemaScope format influenced the formats of paintings. What do you think the greatest influence was?
Sounds correct, but we both know that todays kitsch maybe tomorrows art and vice versa. You would probably be surprised how many acknowledged late 19th century artists worked also as book illustrators, especially history paintings were popular to illustrate history books. Furthermore many works by once famous history painters were later bashfully hidden in the depots. I consider Robert McGinnis as good a craftsman as many of them. Sure the time of history painting had passed in his time. So the interesting thing is the view of history, the interpretation. And here you already mentioned that Boulanger for example painted a 19th century salon in a Pompeiian backdrop. Nearly all 19th century history painters did the same, they painted present subjects in historical costumes. And McGinnis does a bit the same, but to him history isn't the salon, it's Hollywood, CinemaScope. I think, he's therefore less pretentious, more honest, because he doesn't pretend to depict something real in a realistic way, he's showing a movie, a show. History painting always did this (and to me it's a kind of father to Hollywood) but it never admitted it.
History painting dates back to the Renaissance and was long considered to be the "grand genre". Nevertheless it has its peak in the 19th century forged by Neoclassicism and Romanticism. There it became the artistic contribution in the process of the construction of National Identities of the European and American nations.
At the same time history painting under the influence of historism pretended to be "realistic", to show history how it has been. Above all it was this pretension that led to the great failure of History painting AND Realism at the end of the century.
When artists and their public realized that telling history always will be subjective and a painting will always be an illusion Realism and history painting lost their ground to modern painting.
We rarely consider paperback book covers and movie posters as fine art, nor do most art historians examine how the CinemaScope format influenced the formats of paintings. What do you think the greatest influence was?
ReplyDeleteSounds correct, but we both know that todays kitsch maybe tomorrows art and vice versa. You would probably be surprised how many acknowledged late 19th century artists worked also as book illustrators, especially history paintings were popular to illustrate history books.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore many works by once famous history painters were later bashfully hidden in the depots. I consider Robert McGinnis as good a craftsman as many of them. Sure the time of history painting had passed in his time. So the interesting thing is the view of history, the interpretation. And here you already mentioned that Boulanger for example painted a 19th century salon in a Pompeiian backdrop. Nearly all 19th century history painters did the same, they painted present subjects in historical costumes. And McGinnis does a bit the same, but to him history isn't the salon, it's Hollywood, CinemaScope. I think, he's therefore less pretentious, more honest, because he doesn't pretend to depict something real in a realistic way, he's showing a movie, a show. History painting always did this (and to me it's a kind of father to Hollywood) but it never admitted it.