tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-634366373925634459.post2362134377987841659..comments2023-11-22T01:20:04.055-08:00Comments on Painting History: Princes in the TowerXenophonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07670105499646555863noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-634366373925634459.post-66107453680283527132009-12-21T23:38:17.343-08:002009-12-21T23:38:17.343-08:00That's right. Millais is a good example that l...That's right. Millais is a good example that less could be more. His painting is better arranged and illuminated. Nevertheless it's in the end the same cheap hokum.Xenophonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07670105499646555863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-634366373925634459.post-52232135242879870202009-12-21T17:17:51.825-08:002009-12-21T17:17:51.825-08:00oh I agree. Two defenceless little princes, huddle...oh I agree. Two defenceless little princes, huddled together in fear, must have been a terrible and romantic image for artists to play with. Of the pre-Raphaelite versions of the story, I particularly like Sir John Everett Millais' version, painted in 1878.Helshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02849907428208235392noreply@blogger.com